ESG

Our Share Responsibility

Investing in a socially and environmentally responsible manner and leading by example within our own organisation are at the heart of what we do and are firmly embedded in the values of AIF Capital. We aim to conserve natural resources, contribute to environmental protection and promote social cohesion.
To this end, the AIF Capital Group is currently developing a comprehensive ESG strategy that applies across all areas of the Group.

We are already implementing measures relating to environmental, social and governance matters:

AIF Capital assesses ESG criteria for every new investment. The properties are planned and constructed with a strong focus on climate efficiency. Accessibility is a standard feature not only in our social infrastructure properties, but in all our buildings.

Investment funds are assessed against ESG criteria – a requirement that regulated investors are right to expect of our products.

We reward environmentally sustainable behaviour within the company: a mobility and environmental allowance is a standard component of every employee’s employment contract.

Train travel is our first choice: for business trips, the train is our preferred mode of transport. We avoid individual car travel.

All employees receive dedicated training on ESG.

We embrace diversity within our company. Gender and background play no role, as performance is assessed objectively.

We place great importance on health and social balance. Events for our employees and sports activities play an important role in fostering social cohesion within the company.

Sustainability-related Disclosures (Articles 3–5 of the SFDR)

(Last updated: 17 November 2023 / Version 3 / Change Log (in German))

Consideration of Sustainability Risks in Our Investment Decisions

Pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2019 on sustainability‐related disclosures in the financial services sector (the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation, SFDR), financial market participants are required to disclose their strategy for integrating sustainability risks into their investment decision-making processes.

A sustainability risk is an environmental, social or governance (ESG) event or condition which, if it occurs, could have an actual or potential material adverse impact on the value of investments made (a “sustainability risk”). Sustainability risks can affect the known types of risks.

Sustainability risks are taken into account by AIF Kapitalverwaltungs-AG in investment decisions and risk monitoring. This is done throughout the entire investment process, including fundamental analysis, investment decisions and ongoing monitoring. To this end, AIF Kapitalverwaltungs-AG, together with its service providers, collects consumption data for its properties where available and obtains data on physical risks from an established provider.

The impact, likelihood and severity of sustainability risks vary depending on the region and property. AIF Kapitalverwaltungs-AG therefore takes the materiality of sustainability risks into account as part of the investment process. Sustainability risks identified through the analysis of ESG criteria are continuously analysed with regard to their financial impact and are taken into account when assessing returns and risks. This applies both to the analysis of potential investment opportunities and to the ongoing monitoring of existing investments. AIF Kapitalverwaltungs-AG reduces physical risks by taking out insurance policies. Transition risks are continuously analysed, subject to data availability, on the basis of property consumption data. Very high risks can be reduced through structural measures or, as a last resort, the property may be sold.

Transparency of Adverse Sustainability Impacts at Entity Level

AIF Kapitalverwaltungs-AG takes into account, as part of its due diligence in investment decisions, the principal adverse impacts associated with these decisions on sustainability factors (environmental and social matters, workers’ rights, human rights, corruption, bribery, and corporate governance). The consideration of principal adverse impacts is not binding for the individual funds unless such obligations form part of the investment strategy that is subject to investors’ preferences. A subset of the funds managed by the company with a focus on sustainability may include binding commitments with regard to sustainability factors, while other funds monitor adverse impacts from a risk-oriented perspective.

As part of the investment decision-making process, SFDR indicators for principal adverse impacts on sustainability are taken into account. Below you will find our full statement on the principal adverse impacts of investment decisions on sustainability factors for the period:

Transparency of Remuneration Policy in Relation to the Consideration of Sustainability Risks

Environmental, social and responsible corporate governance criteria are embedded in the business strategy of AIF Kapitalverwaltungs-AG. Sustainability risks are taken into account as part of investment decisions and investment advice. At the same time, the remuneration policy ensures that employees’ performance is assessed in a manner that ensures they act in the best interests of clients. The total target bonus is divided into a personal target bonus amounting to 75% and a company bonus amounting to 25%. The individual objectives and their weighting are agreed annually, generally by 28 February, in text form between the employee and their manager. At the end of the year, the degree of target achievement is determined in a joint discussion. The agreed objectives are adjusted where necessary. AIF Kapitalverwaltungs-AG ensures that compliance matters relating to sustainability risks are considered comprehensively for all employees through regular knowledge-sharing and compliance with regulatory requirements. These matters are documented individually in the target agreement and are relevant to the achievement of the agreed objectives.

Remuneration Policy of AIF Kapitalverwaltungs-AG (alternative investment funds management company)

The alternative investment funds management company has established a remuneration scheme for all its employees in accordance with Art. 37 KAGB and Annex II of Directive 2011/61/EU (AIFM Directive), which is compatible with and conducive to a sound and effective risk management system. The remuneration system also applies in particular to the Board of Management, employees whose activities have a significant influence on the risk profile of the alternative investment funds management company or the managed investment funds (risk bearers), employees with control functions and all employees who receive total remuneration, as a result of which they are in the same income bracket as managers and risk bearers.

The objective of the remuneration policy of the alternative investment funds management company is, in addition to meeting regulatory requirements, to promote sustainable and risk-conscious behaviour on the part of employees and to align it with the business model, the long-term success and the risk structure of the alternative investment funds management company. A further central element of the remuneration policy is the consistent alignment of the remuneration scheme with the ethical principles of the alternative investment funds management company.

At the same time, performance should be rewarded and motivated employees should be retained in the company for the long term. However, no incentives are explicitly provided which encourage risk-taking and are not compatible with the risk profile, investment conditions or the articles of association of the investment funds under management. Furthermore, no incentives are given which could prevent the alternative investment funds management company from acting dutifully in the best interests of the investment fund concerned. In this respect, the remuneration policy of the alternative investment funds management company is in line with the business strategy, objectives, values and interests of the alternative investment funds management company and the investment funds it manages.

Employee remuneration consists of fixed remuneration and a variable component. The service agreements of the members of the Management Board provide for compliance with regulatory requirements and compliance with the factors relevant under the SFDR and/or the Taxonomy Regulation in the investment strategies during the reference year as qualitative performance indicators for variable remuneration. These performance indicators are cascaded down to employees. In exceptional individual cases, employees may receive additional bonuses. The following applies to the individual remuneration components:

  • The annual fixed salary is paid in twelve equal monthly amounts. The level of fixed remuneration is determined by the value of the position held and prevailing market conditions. The fixed component is calculated in such a way that employees are not significantly dependent on variable compensation.
  • The variable remuneration, which is calculated on an annual basis, depends on the development of the company and the achievement of personal targets. It may amount to a maximum of 100% of the fixed remuneration. Payment of the variable remuneration is made after the individual degree of target achievement has been determined, the annual financial statements of the alternative investment funds management company have been approved, and the bonus pool available for payment has been approved by the Supervisory Board. The bonus pool available for distribution is determined as part of the budget planning for the following financial year.
  • In special individual cases, employees may receive additional bonuses over and above the variable remuneration (e.g. if special targets have been achieved); in any case, such fringe benefits and their conditions are subject to a separate agreement, with employees having no general entitlement to such a separate agreement.

Due to its size, the alternative investment funds management company has not made use of the facultative option of setting up a remuneration committee.

Concrete information on the annual remuneration paid to directors and other risk bearers is disclosed in the annual accounts or annual reports of the funds.

Policy on the Prevention and Management of Conflicts of Interest

(“COI Policy”)

Table of Contents

  1. Purpose of the Policy
  2. Scope of the Policy
  3. Identification of Conflicts of Interest
  4. Prevention of Conflicts of Interest
  5. Organisational Arrangements
  6. Administrative Measures
  7. Officer for the Prevention of Conflicts of Interest
  8. Resolution and Monitoring of Conflicts of Interest
  9. Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest
  10. Measures in the Event of Breaches of the Policy
  11. Further Development of the Policy

Section 1: Purpose of the Policy

As an alternative investment funds management company (Kapitalverwaltungsgesellschaft) within the meaning of Sections 20 and 22 of the German Capital Investment Code (KAGB), AIF Kapitalverwaltungs-AG, also referred to as AIF Partner KVG (hereinafter “KVG”), is obliged to conduct its activities honestly, fairly and with the required care and diligence and, in doing so, to act in the best interests of the investment funds managed by it and of the investors in such investment funds, as well as in the interest of market integrity. To the extent that potential or actual conflicts of interest within the meaning of Section 27 KAGB arise in the management of investment funds (hereinafter “AIF” – Alternative Investment Fund), KVG must ensure that such conflicts of interest are handled fairly in the interests of the investors and clients. To achieve this, KVG has set out in this Policy appropriate measures for their identification and handling.

Section 2: Scope of the Policy

  1. Wherever business interests are opposed to one another, conflicts of interest may arise. However, this Policy covers only those conflicts of interest that may give rise to a risk of detriment to the clients or to the investors of an AIF managed by KVG (“potential conflict of interest”) or that actually give rise to such detriment (“actual conflict of interest”).
  2. This Policy applies directly to the members of the KVG Management Board and to all KVG employees.
  3. The members of the KVG Management Board are responsible for ensuring that the provisions of this Policy are also observed by
  • outsourcing service providers, their members of management and all employees involved in the outsourced activity

and/or

  • any other natural or legal person directly involved, under an outsourcing arrangement, in the provision of services to KVG that enable KVG to carry out joint portfolio management.

Section 3: Identification of Conflicts of Interest

Parties to a Conflict of Interest

1. In the management of AIFs, conflicts of interest may arise, among other things,

  • between KVG and its executives, employees or any other person who is directly or indirectly linked to KVG by way of control, and the AIF managed by it or the investors of that AIF;
  • between any outsourcing service provider appointed by KVG, its executives, employees or any other person who is directly or indirectly linked to the outsourcing service provider by way of control, and the AIF managed by KVG or the investors of that AIF;
  • between the AIF managed by KVG or the investors of that AIF and another AIF managed by KVG or the investors of that other AIF;
  • between the AIF managed by KVG or the investors of that AIF and another client of KVG;
  • between two of KVG’s clients.

2. Diverging interests

A conflict of interest is indicated in particular where the following situation exists:

  • KVG, an outsourcing service provider or one of the persons referred to in section 2 obtains a financial advantage at the expense of the AIF or its investors;
  • KVG, an outsourcing service provider or one of the persons referred to in section 2 has an interest in the outcome of a service provided for the AIF that does not coincide with the interests of the investors of the AIF managed by KVG in that outcome;
  • KVG, an outsourcing service provider or one of the persons referred to in section 2 avoids a financial loss at the expense of the AIF or its investors;
  • the interests of KVG, an outsourcing service provider or one of the persons referred to in section 2 in the service provided for the AIF are – apart from remuneration – not aligned with the interests of the AIF;
  • the interests of an individual investor, a group of investors or another AIF are favoured to the detriment of the AIF managed by KVG;
  • an identical activity is performed simultaneously for several AIFs;
  • there is a financial or other incentive to place the interests of one AIF above the interests of another AIF also managed by KVG;
  • remuneration is received from a third party in the context of portfolio management.

3. Examples of conflicts of interest

The following situations are examples of typical conflicts of interest:

  1. a) Conflicts of interest between KVG and one of the persons referred to in section 2 on the one hand and/or investors on the other hand
  • KVG commissions an affiliated company or one of the persons referred to in section 2 to provide a service within the scope of the business operations of the AIF, such as the asset management of a property.
  • KVG invests, for the AIFs managed by it, in investment assets that belong to a company affiliated with it or to one of the persons referred to in section 2.
  • KVG appoints an investment adviser for the selection of investment opportunities (e.g. for investments in other funds), where such investment adviser is one of the persons referred to in section 2 or a company affiliated with KVG.
  • The percentage-based management or administration fee of KVG is determined by reference to the amount of capital raised by the AIF (“hard cap in fundraising”).
  • The term of the AIF managed by KVG is extended without any discernible benefit for the investors in order to be able to collect further fees.
  • The AIF participates with capital in a target company. This participation is financed by the granting of a loan by one of the persons referred to in section 2 or by a person who is in a direct or indirect dependency relationship with KVG. KVG has made an investment in a target company and receives ongoing remuneration from it.
  • KVG or one of the persons referred to in section 2 receives gifts or invitations that are not merely insignificant in nature and that are capable of influencing their conduct in a manner contrary to the interests of the investors of the managed AIF,
  • One of the persons referred to in section 2 invests, where applicable on preferential terms, in AIFs managed by KVG or enters into transactions with them.
  1. b) Conflicts of interest between several AIFs
  • Before a first AIF has been fully placed, a KVG or an outsourcing service provider launches a second AIF with a comparable investment strategy. Where investment decisions have to be made, KVG must decide for which of the two AIFs the investment is to be executed.
  • KVG simultaneously manages two AIFs between which a business activity is carried out to the benefit of one and to the detriment of the other AIF.
  • When managing several AIFs, KVG deploys personnel of one AIF for another AIF.
  1. c) Conflicts of interest between investors

KVG grants an individual investor special investment rights that are not available to the other investors of an AIF.

  1. d) Conflicts of interest between clients

KVG brokers the purchase and sale of units or shares in AIFs managed by it between two clients and thereby acts for two clients with opposing interests.

Section 4: Prevention of Conflicts of Interest

  1. In order to prevent conflicts of interest from arising, the persons referred to in section 2 must observe high standards. These include lawful and professional conduct at all times and compliance with general market rules, while always taking the interests of investors into account.
  2. The organisational arrangements and administrative measures to be taken to avoid conflicts of interest are, applying the principle of proportionality, determined by the size and organisation of KVG and the nature, scope and complexity of its business. Safeguards for the prevention of conflicts of interest must be appropriate and effective.
  3. The KVG Management Board or the management of an outsourcing service provider appointed by it must ensure that the persons concerned know and master those procedures that are necessary for the proper performance of their duties.

Section 5: Organisational Arrangements

To avoid conflicts of interest, it must be ensured that the persons referred to in section 2 carry out their business activities independently and, in doing so, take into account potential risks for the AIFs and their investors. The following arrangements have been made for this purpose:

  • Independence
    KVG or any outsourcing service provider appointed by it conducts its business activities independently of the interests of third parties and of instructions from shareholders; in particular, the conclusion of control agreements between KVG and the group parent is refrained from, and any other influence on the independent management of KVG within the group is avoided;
  • Declaration of Independence
    Signing of the declaration of independence attached to this Policy by the members of the KVG’s management and, where applicable, by an outsourcing service provider;
  • Segregation of Duties
    Functional and physical separation of the various business areas, in particular between portfolio management and compliance, control systems and risk management, as well as the separation of duties and areas of responsibility relating to the company’s own operational processes that are considered incompatible with one another or that could potentially give rise to systematic conflicts of interest;
  • Employee Remuneration Policy
    Establishment of an employee remuneration policy in accordance with regulatory requirements, which ensures that the persons referred to in section 2 see their incentive in the performance of all AIFs managed by them, thereby counteracting any preferential treatment of individual AIFs or clients;
  • Chinese Walls
    Establishment of confidentiality areas and information barriers with virtual or actual barriers (so-called “Chinese Walls”) to restrict the flow of information, in particular implementation of access permissions;
  • Employee/Manager Dealing Policy
    Implementation of codes of conduct and procedures for employee/manager dealing;
  • Grant Policy
    Implementation of codes of conduct and procedures governing the acceptance of gifts and other benefits by KVG or by one of the persons referred to in section 2;
  • Institutionalised Conflict of Interest Inquiry
    Before carrying out the relevant measure, portfolio management shall in each case examine whether a conflict of interest exists, namely
  • upon the establishment of a new AIF
  • upon the acquisition and disposal of assets by an AIF
  • in connection with other investment decisions
  • in connection with administrative measures
  • where a person acts for several AIFs (“multiple activity”).

Section 6: Administrative Measures

To avoid conflicts of interest, the KVG Management Board or an outsourcing service provider appointed by it must take the following administrative measures:

  • Establishment of procedures for identifying and resolving conflicts of interest, instruction that such procedures must be complied with without exception, and monitoring of compliance;
  • Monitoring of compliance with the codes of conduct and the procedures for dealing with conflicts of interest by Internal Audit and the Compliance function;
  • Appropriate documentation of the services and activities of KVG or its management, the employees and the persons referred to in section 2, in each case where a conflict of interest has been identified;
  • In the case of investment opportunities that may be considered for several AIFs with the same investment strategy, KVG will offer the investment opportunity, in accordance with the principle of equal treatment, to all eligible AIFs managed by it on the same terms and, where several AIFs managed by it are interested in the investment, allocate the investment opportunity among the interested AIFs or, where allocation is not possible, apply a suitable allocation procedure (rotation procedure or random principle/lottery procedure) and document this accordingly;
  • To the extent required for the appropriate resolution or monitoring of a conflict of interest, the persons referred to in section 2 may be requested to discontinue their work on a specific business activity or their participation in management in order to resolve a potential conflict of interest;
  • Training of all relevant KVG employees or of the outsourcing service providers engaged by it, as well as of the other persons referred to in section 2.

Section 7: Officer for the Prevention of Conflicts of Interest

  1. The KVG Management Board has appointed an Officer for the Prevention of Conflicts of Interest who directly reports to management.
  2. The person responsible for conflicts of interest is responsible for receiving and reviewing notifications pursuant to section 8 of this policy.
  3. The person responsible for conflicts of interest must ensure that the persons affected by this policy are generally informed about it and are trained regularly.
  4. In addition, the Officer for the Prevention of Conflicts of Interest is responsible for regularly monitoring compliance with this policy.
  5. The Officer for the Prevention of Conflicts of Interest reports directly to the management on the performance of their duties on a regular basis, and at least annually.

Section 8: Resolution and Monitoring of Conflicts of Interest

  1. Conflicts of interest must be reported without undue delay and must be handled and resolved in a fair manner.
  2. Each of the persons referred to in section 2 is therefore obliged to report without undue delay to the Officer for the Prevention of Conflicts of Interest those facts that indicate the existence of a conflict of interest situation within the meaning of section 2 (1) of this policy.
  3. The Officer for the Prevention of Conflicts of Interest examines whether the facts presented indicate a conflict of interest situation within the meaning of section 2 (1) of this policy. If this is the case, he must inform the KVG Management Board without undue delay of the nature and extent of the conflict of interest and document this accordingly.
  4. The assessment and remediation of the conflict of interest is then carried out by the KVG Management Board.
  5. To the extent that the existing and ongoing measures are not suitable or not sufficient to resolve a conflict of interest, the KVG Management Board must take additional measures, such as:
  • diligent examination of all available measures and implementation of AIF-specific information restrictions or other additional measures for the separation of information;
  • transfer of the conflict of interest management to a higher management level that is responsible for the KVG’s business strategy and is able to assess the potential risks;
  • termination of the activity.

Section 9: Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest

  1. KVG is obliged to inform investors about conflicts of interest as soon as it becomes apparent that the organisational measures taken by KVG to identify, prevent, resolve and monitor conflicts of interest are not sufficient to ensure, with reasonable certainty, that the risk of impairment of the interests of investors and/or of the managed AIF is avoided.
  2. The disclosure obligation includes informing investors, prior to the execution of the affected business measure, of the general nature and sources of the conflicts of interest.
  3. The disclosure obligation also covers potential conflicts of interest that may arise in connection with the delegation/outsourcing or sub-delegation of activities.
  4. Furthermore, any transactions between one of the persons referred to in section 2 or between closely connected companies or persons that are linked to KVG by a direct or indirect control relationship in connection with a managed AIF must be disclosed.
  5. Disclosure shall be made by publication on the website of KVG or by another medium that is accessible to the relevant addressees. For this purpose, KVG must
  • communicate the address of the website to the investors and ensure by appropriate measures that the investor is able to take note of it,
  • continuously update the information posted on the website,
  • ensure that the information stored on the website is accessible to investors at all times.

Section 10: Measures in the Event of Breaches of the Policy

  1. In the event of a breach of this Conflicts of Interest Management Policy, the KVG Management Board must without undue delay identify and remedy the cause or the weakness in the working or operational process that led to such breach.
  2. A breach of this Conflicts of Interest Management Policy is deemed to constitute a breach of duty and may lead to disciplinary measures and, in serious cases, to termination of the employment relationship.
  3. The competent supervisory authority must be informed of a serious breach of the policy.

Section 11: Further Development of the Policy

  1. The KVG Management Board is responsible for the ongoing development and maintenance of the Conflicts of Interest Management Policy; in particular, the Management Board will resolve upon and arrange for necessary and appropriate amendments and/or supplements.
  2. The Officer for the Prevention of Conflicts of Interest is responsible for keeping employees continuously informed of any amendments and additions to this policy. They shall draw the management’s attention to any necessary updates to the policy.

Transparency of the Promotion of Environmental or Social Characteristics and Sustainable Investments on Websites

Pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2019 on sustainability-related disclosures in the financial services sector, AIF Kapitalverwaltungs-AG is required under Article 10 of the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation to ensure transparency in the promotion of environmental or social characteristics and sustainable investments for financial products within the meaning of Article 8 of the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation.

Description of the Environmental and Social Characteristics

The information to be published pursuant to Article 10 of the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation for the fund “AIF Lebensquartiere I” is set out below.

Description of the Environmental and Social Characteristics
The investment strategy of the AIF takes into account environmental and social characteristics, with a focus on environmental aspects.

Following a four-year ramp-up period after the launch of the fund, the company will continuously invest at least 60% of the lettable area of all properties held by the special investment fund in properties that meet the environmental and social characteristics defined by the company for the special investment fund (“investment quota”).

When selecting suitable properties during the acquisition process and throughout the entire holding period, a scoring system is used to capture and measure the defined environmental and social characteristics. The scoring system consists of a total of two mandatory criteria (“mandatory criteria”) and 14 optional criteria (“optional criteria”) covering the areas of “Environmental” and “Social”.

To qualify for inclusion in the AIF’s investment quota defined above, a property must meet all of the mandatory criteria and at least 50% of the optional criteria on a cumulative basis.

The criteria are explained and defined in more detail below:

Mandatory Criteria

The investment property is not involved in the extraction, removal, storage, manufacture or transport of fossil fuels
Neither the building nor the land itself may be directly involved in the extraction, removal, storage, manufacture or transport of fossil fuels. This means, for example, that no petrol stations or other buildings serving such a purpose may be located on the site. Corresponding storage facilities are also excluded, except for oil tanks used to cover peak demand. Tenants whose business activities are related to the extraction, removal, storage, manufacture or transport of fossil fuels are not excluded, unless the leased premises are directly used for one of the activities described above.

The investment property has an energy performance certificate rated at least C if completed before 31 December 2020; if completed after 31 December 2020, its primary energy demand must be below the nZEB standard
If the investment property was completed before 31 December 2020, an energy performance certificate with a rating of at least C is required. If completed after 31 December 2020, its primary energy demand must be below the nZEB standard. This corresponds to a maximum primary energy demand of 40 kWh/m² per year. This must be demonstrated by a corresponding energy performance certificate issued by an external assessor.

Optional Criteria

Environmental

Availability of a Smart Metering Concept
To accurately measure a building’s greenhouse gas emissions, an intelligent metering concept is required. The so-called Scope 1 greenhouse gas emissions refer to all emissions directly caused by the building, particularly those resulting from heating. These can be measured using appropriate heat meters in combination with the respective energy source used.

Scope 2 emissions also include emissions resulting from the property’s electricity consumption. These must be measured using so-called “smart meters”, i.e. intelligent electricity meters. The above criterion is therefore considered to be met if the investment property is equipped with appropriate meters that can be used to measure Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions, i.e. heating consumption and electricity consumption across all leased areas.

Rainwater harvesting or rainwater infiltration on the property
This criterion is considered to be met if structural facilities or systems for the use of rainwater are available (e.g. rainwater cisterns). Alternatively, rainwater infiltration or retention should be possible on the property (e.g. infiltration pits or extensive green roofs designed to retain water).

Heating with environmentally friendly energy sources/heating systems
This criterion is considered to be met if the investment property is heated using an environmentally friendly energy source or heating system. The following options qualify:

Geothermal energy
Combined heat and power (CHP) plant (using renewable energy sources such as biogas, plant oils, wood chips or wood pellets)
Local/district heating
Pellet heating
Heat pump
A key requirement for this criterion is that no fossil fuels such as diesel, heating oil, natural gas or liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) are used to heat the investment property.

Generation of electricity from renewable energy sources on site
This criterion is considered to be met if electricity is generated on site using renewable energy sources. In addition to electricity generation from solar systems, which must be installed on at least 40% of the roof areas suitable for this purpose, we also define combined heat and power (CHP) plants operated using renewable energy sources, such as biogas, plant oils, wood chips or wood pellets, as renewable energy sources. CHP plants operated using fossil fuels such as diesel, heating oil, natural gas or liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) are not included. As a third option, we consider electricity generation through a fuel cell heating system to meet this criterion.

More than 20% of the site area is covered with greenery
This criterion is considered to be met if at least 20% of the site area of the investment property is covered with greenery. This also includes green façades and intensive/extensive green roofs. The fulfilment rate for this criterion is calculated based on the site area covered in greenery in relation to the total site area. For this purpose, vertical green façades are treated as equivalent to site areas covered in greenery.

Charging stations for electric cars/e-bikes
This criterion is considered to be met if the investment property provides at least one charging station or charging point for electric cars or e-bikes for every 10 residential units.

Energy efficiency standard of at least KfW 55, defined by Germany’s national promotional Bank KfW
The average annual primary energy demand of an investment property must not exceed 55% of the value specified for a reference building. In addition, transmission heat loss must not exceed 70% of that of such a reference building. The reference building is determined in accordance with the German Energy Saving Ordinance (Energieeinsparverordnung, EnEV) or the German Building Energy Act (Gebäudeenergiegesetz, GEG) applicable to the investment property. These values must be verified by an independent assessor through an appropriate energy performance certificate.

Social

Access to public transport
This criterion is considered to be met if public transport, such as buses, trains, underground trains or suburban trains, is within walking distance. For the purposes of this criterion, we define “within walking distance” as being within 500 metres of the investment property.

Availability of local shopping facilities and/or childcare facilities
This criterion is considered to be met if the investment property contains shops providing everyday essentials or a childcare facility/kindergarten. Shops providing everyday essentials include grocery stores and/or drugstores.

>20% of the residential floor area consists of publicly or otherwise subsidised housing
This criterion is considered to be met if more than 20% of the residential floor area of the investment property consists of publicly subsidised, rent-controlled or otherwise subsidised housing. Publicly subsidised or rent-controlled rental housing refers to housing that has been constructed or modernised with funding from public budgets or promotional banks (excluding KfW) and is subject to restrictions on occupancy and rent levels for a specified period (social housing obligation).

By “otherwise subsidised housing”, we mean rental housing that is let for at least 5% below the local rent index on a permanent basis (for at least 10 years from the acquisition of the investment property). The fulfilment rate for this criterion is calculated based on the residential floor area meeting the above requirements in relation to the total floor area of the investment property.

>20% of the apartments meet the applicable accessibility requirements
This criterion is considered to be met if more than 20% of the apartments in the investment property meet the applicable accessibility requirements. Accessibility is defined in accordance with the applicable state building regulations (Landesbauverordnung) for residential properties and the relevant administrative regulation on “Technical Building Regulations”. The applicable state building regulations depend on the federal state in which the investment property is located and the year in which it was built. The fulfilment rate is calculated based on the number of accessible apartments in relation to the total number of apartments in the investment property to be acquired.

Availability of a sufficient number of weather-protected and secure bicycle parking spaces
This criterion is considered to be met if at least 20% more bicycle parking spaces are available per residential unit than required under the state building regulations applicable to the property in the year it was built. These parking spaces must be protected from the weather and secure, meaning that they must be covered if located outside the building and that bicycles must be capable of being locked and secured. Each separate rental apartment in the property is defined as a residential unit. Rental areas with other uses, such as retail or office space, are not included in the calculation.

Availability of a playground exceeding statutory requirements
This criterion is considered to be met if the playground associated with the investment property exceeds the applicable statutory requirements for playground area by more than 10%. The relevant requirements are those set out in the state building regulations applicable to the property in the year it was built.

Availability of bike-sharing or bicycle repair facilities
This criterion is considered to be met if the investment property provides at least two bicycles per 50 apartments for use by tenants as part of a bike-sharing service, or alternatively provides a bicycle repair station on the premises where tenants can maintain and repair their own bicycles.

Monitoring of Ecological and Social Criteria

AIF Capital will assess compliance with the environmental and social characteristics described above for the investment properties to be acquired as part of the acquisition process and on an ongoing basis throughout the entire holding period, with such assessment being carried out once a year. In this way, the company ensures that the defined environmental and social criteria are continuously met to the extent specified in the investment terms and conditions. The results are reported to investors through the relevant reporting and the AIF’s annual report.

When selecting suitable properties during the acquisition process and throughout the entire holding period, a scoring system is used to capture and measure the defined environmental and social characteristics. The scoring system consists of a total of two mandatory criteria (“mandatory criteria”) and 14 optional criteria (“optional criteria”) covering the areas of “Environmental” and “Social”.

To qualify for inclusion in the AIF’s investment quota defined above, a property must meet all of the mandatory criteria and at least 50% of the optional criteria on a cumulative basis.

If an investment property no longer meets the defined investment quota during the holding period, appropriate measures will be taken in a timely manner to ensure compliance with the environmental and social characteristics. If this is not possible, e.g. for economic reasons, the company will consider further strategic options, which may also include divestment.

Initiatives

Together with national and international industry associations and organisations, we are actively promoting sustainability in the real estate sector.

Logo der Inititative GRESB
Logo gif